United States v. Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken by the United States to reverse certain orders made by the District Court in highway condemnation proceedings instituted in the name of and on behalf of the State of Minnesota.
It appears that by article 16 of the Constitution of Minnesota, trunk highway No. 61 or constitutional highway No. 1 was designated as beginning at a point on the boundary line between the states of Iowa and Minnesota and extending northerly through the city of St. Paul, thence northerly through the city of Duluth, and thence northeasterly to a point on the boundary line…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- United States v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Grand River Dam Authority v. ParkerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Public Service Co. v. Approximately 15.49 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015