Legal Opinion · Dissent

Amelia J. Taylor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1958No. 24823_1Published

1DissentDimock, District Judge

I concur except that I would direct that the payments which accompanied the Newcombes’ income tax returns be set off against petitioner’s liability. A necessary part of the decision that the income was petitioner’s is that the brokerage accounts which earned it were petitioner’s. The payments which accompanied the Newcombes’ income tax returns went direct from those brokerage accounts to the United States Treasury. The Government is saying with one breath “the brokerage accounts were petitioner’s” and with the next “the money which went direct from those brokerage accounts to the Treasury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. Masterson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1942
  3. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API