Legal Opinion

Anderberg v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 6, 2023No. 3:21-cv-01794Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HEIDI ANDERBERG, individually and on Case No.: 3:21-cv-01794-RBM-SBC behalf of others similarly situated, 12 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff, 13 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. 14 [Doc. 42] THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC., a 15 Delaware Corporation, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On March 2, 2022, Defendant The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a 20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Heidi Anderberg’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Class Action 21 Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”). (Doc. 16.) Plaintiff filed an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Tamara Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Sean McGinity v. the Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. Brady v. Bayer Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia Corporation v. Paul Mantor, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API