Legal Opinion

Sramek v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 2007No. 2D05-4037PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The circuit court convicted Michael Sra-mek of indirect criminal contempt. We reverse because the order to show cause was not based on a proper affidavit.

The prosecution of indirect criminal contempt is governed by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Florida courts have held that failure to strictly follow the dictates of that rule is fundamental error. See Cone v. Gillson, 861 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Mix v. State, 827 So.2d 397, 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Hunt v. State, 659 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Moreover, the fact that a defendant has already served…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Hunt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Giles v. RenewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Cone v. GillsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. M.L.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. A. N. W. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  4. BRET MAYO v. KERRY MAYO O/ B/ O NATALIE GRACYN MAYO AND MADELINE OLIVIA MAYODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API