Legal Opinion

In Re Infinito

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

94 N.J. 50 (1983)

462 A.2d 160

IN THE MATTER OF VINCENT J. INFINITO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 16, 1983.

Decided July 20, 1983.

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Bernard F. Conway argued the cause for respondent.

2Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arose as a result of a presentment that was filed by the District XI Ethics Committee against respondent, a member of the bar, based upon respondent's conviction for larceny of property valued at over $500.00 and conspiracy to commit larceny. After hearing on the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. In Re RosenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. In Re MirabelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. In Re MischlichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API