Legal Opinion
In Re Bailey
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 10, 2009No. 19-30363PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR AUTHORITY TO SETTLE CONTROVERSY
KAY WOODS, Bankruptcy Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Motion for Authority to Settle Controversy (“Motion to Settle”) (Doc. # 83) filed by Andrew W. Suhar, Chapter 7 Trustee in this case (“Trustee”), on September 25, 2009. On October 15, 2009, Debtors Edwin D. Bailey (“Mr.Bailey”) and Jamie S. Bailey (collectively, “Debtors”), acting pro se, filed (i) Debtors’ Pro Se Objection to Trustee’s Motion for Authority to Settle Controversy (“Debtor’s Objection”) (Doc. # 86); and (ii) Debtors’ Pro Se Motion for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Charles W. Bauer, Jr. And Nellie P. Bauer, Robert H. Waldschmidt, Trustee v. Commerce Union Bank, Clarksville, Tennessee and Kenneth C. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Dallas Cabana, Inc. v. Hyatt Corporation and Donald N. PritzkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- In Re CarsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simmerman v. Ocwen Financial & Mortgage Services, Inc. (In re Simmerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. v. Banks (In re McKenzie)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012