Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Borough of New Kensington

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1905No. 20Published

At Law. Trial by the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, this cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. Upon the amended record this is an action of assumpsit in the name of G. A. Coleman, a citizen of the state of Ohio, for the use of the *685•Commercial National Bank, a national banking association, located in Steubenville, in the state of Ohio, against the borough of New Kensington, a municipal corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, located in the Western district thereof, to recover the amount of four vouchers or warrants numbered, respectively, 556, 557,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wall v. County of MonroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Gable v. AltoonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. City of Williamsport v. Commonwealth ex rel. BairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  5. City of Scranton v. Hyde Park Gas, Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API