Legal Opinion

(PC) Casey v. Haddad

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 22, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00855Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-KES-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS 14 HADDAD, et al., (Doc. 64) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s constitutional 19 claims against Defendants Castro, Fernandez, and Haddad. 20 I. INTRODUCTION…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  3. Sanchez v. RodriguezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API