Legal Opinion
Spillman v. Spillman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we cannot say that the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the reconstructed record was adequate for its review was erroneous as a matter of law.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Salas v. SalasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Brown v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Claim of CarraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997