Executors of Loop v. Adminstratrix of Loop
Supreme Court of Vermont
This was an appeal taken from the decree of the "Court of Probate, relative to the accounts existing between the two estates. The accounts had been sent to an auditor who made a detailed report to this court, to which exceptions were taken.
Read the full summary
This was an appeal taken from the decree of the "Court of Probate, relative to the accounts existing between the two estates. The accounts had been sent to an auditor who made a detailed report to this court, to which exceptions were taken. A great portion of the report and papers in the cause have no direct relation to any principle now to be decided; but only to various items of the accounts, some of which fall within those principles, and others are at rest without any exception to the auditor’s decision. The history of the transactions of the parties, so far as need now be mentioned, is,…
1Opinion of the CourtHutchinson, J.
The
court have considered the arguments, of counsel and have come to the conclusion to accept the report. The terms of the partnership do not any where appear. It does not appear that Joseph JB. Loop was to have half of the profits of the trade, aside from the will. And he being a minor at the time, his services, prima facie, belonged to his father. But, it is probable there was an understanding between them that the young man was to have half the profits : but he was furnished with no evidence of it. And the farther furnishes the evidence by the will, and at the same time, to show…
2Cited by3 opinions
- McNeal v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Paul v. HummelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Blumenthal v. TannenholzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879