11-01 36 Avenue LLC v. Quamar
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin E. Ritholtz, J.
As all lawyers specializing in real estate know, a “time-is-of-the-essence clause” is a contractual provision making timely performance a condition. In the case at bar, such a clause was not expressly included in the contract, but asserted in a letter. The current motion raises the interesting issues where such a clause may be asserted in a letter and whether such a letter was received and gave timely notice.
I. The Plaintiff’s Allegations
The plaintiff alleges that, on or about October 15, 2015, Michael Benz, the managing member of plaintiff 11-01 36…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mohen v. MooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Suarez v. IngallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fortune Limousine Service, Inc. v. Nextel CommunicationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Nehmadi v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.