Legal Opinion

11-01 36 Avenue LLC v. Quamar

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin E. Ritholtz, J.

As all lawyers specializing in real estate know, a “time-is-of-the-essence clause” is a contractual provision making timely performance a condition. In the case at bar, such a clause was not expressly included in the contract, but asserted in a letter. The current motion raises the interesting issues where such a clause may be asserted in a letter and whether such a letter was received and gave timely notice.

I. The Plaintiff’s Allegations

The plaintiff alleges that, on or about October 15, 2015, Michael Benz, the managing member of plaintiff 11-01 36…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Mohen v. MooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Suarez v. IngallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Fortune Limousine Service, Inc. v. Nextel CommunicationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Nehmadi v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API