Legal Opinion
Plato's Cave Corp. v. State Liquor Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 1986PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Petitioner argues that the State Liquor Authority (SLA) *793improperly relied upon definitions in the Penal Law in holding that it permitted "gambling” on its premises in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (6) and that the evidence was, in any event, insufficient to establish that it "suffered or permitted” gambling.1
The first argument is predicated upon the fact that, although the Joker Poker machine played by the SLA investigator gave nothing else by way of a prize, it permitted a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hecht v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Betz v. HorrNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Delaware Midland Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Delaware Midland Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Westhampton BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Albany Law School v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Dutchess County Department of Social Services v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. PeasleeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- In Re PetrocciUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- In Re PeasleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.