Legal Opinion

Strauss-Eckardt Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 14, 1948No. C. D. 1108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eewall, Judge:

It is claimed in this case' that the collector in liquidating an entry of Christmas-tree ornaments failed to obey this court’s mandate and did not use as a basis of .value the reappraised values found by the court. The said Christmas-tree ornaments were the subject of reappraisement No. 136340-A (collector’s No. 555) decided in Strauss-Eckhardt Co., Inc. v. United States, 8 Cust. Ct. 675, Reap. Dec. 5611. The collector used as a basis of value the entered value.

Entry was made upon a so-called duress certificate filed in attempted compliance with section 503 (b) of the Tariff Act…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zinberg v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Sabine Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Strauss-Eckhardt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allied French Furs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. W. X. Huber & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API