Legal Opinion

Asato v. Meadow Gold Dairies-Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1985No. 10104, 10105 and 10106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The workmen’s compensation claims of Richard Asato, Hideo Nobuji, and William Yamamoto (claimants-appellants) were consolidated for argument on appeal to determine whether the Industrial Relations Appeals Board (Appeals Board) properly denied their claims as barred by the statute of limitations under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 386-82. 1 In affirming the decision of the Appeals Board, we hold that the statute of limitations was not tolled for any of the reasons asserted by the claimants-appellants.

I

Claimants-appellants Asato, Nobuji and Yamamoto filed claims for workmen’s compensation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Poythress v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Swafford v. SchoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Meads v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Oklahoma Cotton Coop Ass'n Compress v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Montgomery County v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API