Legal Opinion

People v. Purdy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1973No. Docket 14414-14415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

On March 6, 1972 defendants Purdy and Johnson pleaded guilty to assault with intent to rob being armed in Detroit Recorder’s Court. MCLA 750.89; MSA 28.284. Both defendants now appeal their convictions by right alleging that the trial court did not inform them of their right to confront their accusers. Defendants’ allegations are sound, and therefore we reverse.

An examination of the guilty plea transcript reveals the following exchange between the trial judge and the defendants with regard to their right of confrontation:

"The Court: Do you know that if you had a trial you wouldn’t have to go…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. ChappellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. D'ARGISMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. MathisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. MathisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. PurdyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. WellsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API