Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Syrian Arab Republic

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 15, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2023-0267Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMUEL ROBERT GOODWIN, ) Plaintiff, ) Vv. Case No: 1:23-cv-00267 (CKK/GMH) SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, Defendant. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Samuel Robert Goodwin (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against the Syrian Arab Republic (“Syria”) under the state sponsor of terrorism exception (“terrorism exception’) to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1605A. In a decision issued on April 8, 2025, Judge Kollar-Kotelly found that Plaintiff had established that Syria, whose officials abducted him shortly…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Price v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab JamahiriyaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. Valore v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Murphy v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Cicippio-Puleo v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API