Nagle v. Homer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. The complaint alleges that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eighty-six hundred and six dollars and sixty-seven cents, on a certain acceptance, or instrument, in writing, as follows: “$8,606 67. San Francisco, Jan. 31st, 1854. “ Please pay to my own order the sum of eight thousand six hundred and six dollars and sixty-seven cents, for value received, the same to be paid out of the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. The complaint alleges that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eighty-six hundred and six dollars and sixty-seven cents, on a certain acceptance, or instrument, in writing, as follows: “$8,606 67. San Francisco, Jan. 31st, 1854. “ Please pay to my own order the sum of eight thousand six hundred and six dollars and sixty-seven cents, for value received, the same to be paid out of the appropriation,- as soon as made, for the extra- work done to the United States Marine Hospital building in this city, a statement…
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The plaintiff declared upon the following instrument in writing:
88,606 67. San Francisco, Jan. 31, 1854.
Please to pay to my own order the sum of eight thousand six hundred and six dollars and sixty-seven cents, for value received, the same to be paid out of the appropriation, as soon as made, for the extra work done to the United States hospital building, in this city; a statement of which has been made out and regularly forwarded, by the proper authorities, to the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, to be laid before Congress at the present session; this sum being in full of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Carlisle v. HooksTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- State ex rel. Wolf v. Pullman Palace Car Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1883