Legal Opinion

Plaza v. Black

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2024No. 2023-0762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 487.] PLAZA, APPELLANT, v. BLACK, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Plaza v. Black,

2024-Ohio-853.] Habeas corpus—Parole revocation—Appellant’s petition failed to state with sufficient specificity facts that would entitle him to habeas relief—Court of appeals’ judgment granting warden’s motion to dismiss affirmed. (No. 2023-0762—Submitted December 12, 2023—Decided March 12, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 22CA011932,

2023-Ohio-1787. ________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Appellant, Robert Plaza, who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cannon v. Mohr (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Goudlock v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brown v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Scarberry v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Ellison v. Black (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Folley v. Chambers-SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. King v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API