Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Stegall

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The object of the bill was a construction of the wills of G. W. Hodges and his wife, Mary Elizabeth Hodges, and a decree declaring the rights of claimants under both wills. The chancellor found that there was a want of equity on the face of the bill and upon, that ground sustained defendants’ demurrer. He held that both wills were unambiguous and a construction was not necessary, and that the unequal distribution made b.y Mrs. Hodges was not a fraudulent exercise of the power conferred by her husband. The complainants invoked, and the chancellor refused to apply, the doctrine of illusory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lines v. DardenSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  2. Simmons v. LeonardTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Graeff & Wife v. DeTurkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  4. Herrick v. FowlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hawthorn v. UlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weiss v. Broadway National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Muse v. SluderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Hodges v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  4. Allen v. First American National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  5. Beasley v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API