Legal Opinion

Long Island Tinsmith Supply Corp. v. John H. Ramberg & Son, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 28, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.

This motion is brought under sections 696 et seq. of the Civil Practice Act for the purpose of having title to a Ford truck determined by this court. The application has been initiated by the service of motion papers upon the city marshal, third party, and the defendant, appearing in person. The moving affidavit contends that the transfer was a fraudulent one and effected for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of the judgment debtor, John H. Ramberg & Son, Inc. After the judgment was entered the city marshal levied upon the truck. Frederick J. Widlicka, third party, served a demand upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isabelle Properties, Inc. v. EdelmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  2. Minor v. GurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Cohen v. SobelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monarch Sales Co. v. VollmerNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In re SkotakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Gilbert v. Republic Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Utica City Court · 1953
  4. In re Equilease Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. Ortiz Tejada v. Lewis DenoeTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API