Rogers v. City of Kennewick
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Defendants-Appellants the City of Kennewick, et al., and Richard and Jane Doe Dopke appeal the district court’s judgment following a jury verdict of unlawful seizure, the award of compensatory and punitive damages to Plaintiffs Kenneth and Mary Lou Rogers, and the district court’s grant of attorneys fees and costs to the Rogers.
1. Although Mr. Rogers was not the actual suspect that the police officers sought, the police K-9’s biting of Mr. Rogers constituted a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. See Brower v. County of Inyo, 489 U.S. 593, 596, 109 S.Ct. 1378, 103 L.Ed.2d 628…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKay v. City of HaywardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Hope v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
- Sims v. City of LakewoodDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023