Legal Opinion

Haase v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1959No. 37,582PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

On April 12, 1957, plaintiff, a farmer in Washington County, and defendant executed a written contract under the terms of which plaintiff agreed to plant and grow a crop of sweet com which defendant agreed to purchase under the terms of the contract. Pertinent portions thereof are as follows:

“1. Elmer Haase of Lake Elmo (hereinafter known as the grower) hereby agrees to plant, grow, harvest, and deliver; and Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stern v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Haase v. NonnemacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Vassau v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Gosline v. Prince Macaroni Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Mason v. Farmers Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Shaw v. KruidenierDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API