Legal Opinion

Clark v. Burning Moscow Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On Appeal from the First Judicial District, Hon. Richard Rising presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

*98Opinion by

Beatty, J., Brosnan, J., concurring.

The only error complained of in this case is that the judgment is for gold coin. It only differs from the case of B. E. Hastings & Co. against the same defendant in this, that the judgment is founded on a trial and finding of facts, and not on the consent of defendant. Upon the authority of B. F. Hastings & Co. v. same defendant, the judgment in this case is modified so as to strike out all that portion thereof which requires the same to be satisfied in gold coin. The Court below is directed to make said modification.

The appellant will recover its…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Justice Court of Tonopah TownshipNevada Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Jumbo Mining Co. v. District Court of the First Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API