Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 3, 1999No. 97-4596PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, who was sentenced as a habitual felony offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), challenges the constitutionality of chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which amended the statute, on the ground that the act violated the single subject requirement included in Article II, Section 6, of the Florida Constitution. In support of his argument, appellant relies on Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998), in which the Second District found chapter 95-182 to be unconstitutional under the single subject rule.

We conclude that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Tims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API