Legal Opinion

Grevemberg v. Roane

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1913No. 19,413PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; Charles A. O’Neill, Judge. Action by Agricela J. Grevemberg against J. D. Roane. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

This suit is for slander and assault; but the slander part must be disregarded.

The jury gave plaintiff $300. The appeal is by defendant. Plaintiff has moved that it be dismissed on the ground that there was no motion made for a new trial, and with that motion has coupled, in the alternative, the somewhat incongruous prayer that the judgment be increased.

[1] Failure to have asked for a new trial is no ground for dismissing an appeal. Kramer v. Railroad Co., 51 La. Ann. 1689, 26 South. 411. The motion to dismiss must therefore be overruled. But it has served the purpose of showing that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kramer v. New Orleans, City & Lake RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. First Nat. Bank of Arcadia v. Richardson Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Suarez v. SuarezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Woods v. William Rednour Transfer Storage Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Succession of WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API