Legal Opinion

Petkas v. Grizzard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1984No. 41085PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Presiding Justice.

Jim Petkas, as a director and shareholder of Piedmont-Lindbergh Corporation, sued James Grizzard, Eugene Simons and the corporation, alleging illegal disposition of corporate assets, fraud, conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitation, and there was a verdict against defendant Grizzard only. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the trial court should have dismissed the action as barred by the statute of limitation, and that the trial judge could not take judicial notice…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Petkas v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Tybrisa Co. v. Tybeeland, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Cobb County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Board of Lights & Water WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Justice v. DunbarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. Smith v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wadkins v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Crawford v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Conyers Toyota, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Grizzard v. PetkasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API