Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fag Bearings Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1998No. 97-1480, 97-1599 and 97-2844PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

Appellee/Cross-Appellant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”) filed this declaratory judgment action to determine its contractual obligations to defend and indemnify Appellant/Cross-Appellee FAG Bearings Corp. (“FAG”) for damages arising out of an alleged environmental contamination and cleanup. The district court ** granted summary judgment to Liberty in part, ordering that there is no duty of indemnification; granted summary judgment to FAG in part, finding that Liberty had a duty to defend FAG until the issue of indemnification was resolved; and denied Liberty…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. David A. Duffy v. Charles R. Wolle Harold D. Vietor Ronald Longstaff, Sued as Ronald E. LongstaffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics Corporation, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Nashua Corp. v. First State InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Rhonda Callanan v. Marvin T. Runyun, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Fag Bearings Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Fag Bearings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API