Legal Opinion

Fritschle v. Andes

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 5, 1999No. Civ. AMD 98-1694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

' MEMORANDUM

DAVIS, District Judge.

This is an action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that the Worcester County Board of Education (“WCBE”) violated the IDEA in failing to provide their child Andrew with a “free appropriate public education” during the 1996-97 school year and they seek reimbursement for the costs of private schooling. A Maryland state administrative law judge (“ALJ”) ruled against plaintiffs during the administrative processing of this case, prompting the appeal to this court. After the 180 day…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mairin Doyle Brian Doyle Margaret Doyle v. Arlington County School Board, and Arthur W. Gosling John S. Davis Virginia Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Rowland v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pro-Football, Inc., D/B/A Washington Redskins, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Board of Education v. Wolinsky Ex Rel. Lance C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  5. United States v. LaRosaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fritschle v. AndesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API