Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 2010No. ED 93293PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Larry Howard (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of one count of second-degree trafficking, in violation of Section 195.223, 1 for which Movant had been sentenced to thirteen years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). No error of law appears.…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibbs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibbs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API