Howard v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Larry Howard (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of one count of second-degree trafficking, in violation of Section 195.223, 1 for which Movant had been sentenced to thirteen years’ imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). No error of law appears.…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Gibbs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
4Cited by1 opinion
- Gibbs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010