Legal Opinion

In Re Search Warrant for Records From AT & T

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 9, 2017No. 2016-0187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The State appeals an order of the Circuit Court ( Rappa , J.) denying an application for a search warrant. The trial court ruled that it lacked the authority to issue the search warrant because the application sought records held by AT&T, a foreign corporation. We reverse.

I. Factual Background

The following facts are gleaned from the record before us and are not materially disputed by the parties. The State represents that AT&T is a telecommunications company that provides, among other things, mobile telephone services to the public, that AT&T has business operations and a registered agent in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Overby v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hemenway v. HemenwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. Wagner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Computac, Inc. v. Dixie News Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Hardy v. BetzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. C. L. LevineMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Amanda Colburn v. Nicholas Saykaly & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020
  3. Curtis S. Ridlon v. New Hampshire Bureau of Securities RegulationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. Petition of New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and FamiliesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API