Legal Opinion

People v. Salazar

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John M. Leventhal, J.

The issue of first impression to be determined by this court is whether a defendant can forfeit his statutory right to a speedy trial. This question is answered in the affirmative.

procedural history

The defendant had moved this court to dismiss the indictment on statutory speedy trial grounds (CPL 30.30). The People filed opposition papers. After oral argument, this court granted a hearing to determine the reasons for the 182-day delay from December 10, 1997 until June 10, 1998. (People v Salazar, NYLJ, Nov. 17, 1998, at 32, col 3.) The People argue…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API