Legal Opinion

State v. Four Video Slot MacHines

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 23, 1995No. 24183PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Acting Chief Justice:

At issue in this case is whether “Lucky 8 Line” machines are exempt from the provisions of S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2710 (Supp. 1993).1 The Magistrate held the machines in violation of the statute and ordered their destruction. The Circuit Court reversed the Magistrate’s finding and the State appeals.

We reverse.

A review of the essential facts reveals that “Lucky 8 Line” is a coin-operated machine with a video display designed to simulate a slot machine. The player inserts money and presses a button. A computer program causes the screens to roll and randomly stop,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. RamseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. Powell v. Red Carpet LoungeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. One Coin-Operated Video Game MacHineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Ellis v. OliverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. VarvilCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API