United States v. Nelson
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, Judge.
Defendant was indicted at the May term, 1886, of the district court for selling distilled liquors in the town of Sitka, in the district of Alaska, contrary to the statutes of the United States made and provided against, etc. To this indictment defendant has demurred upon two grounds: (1) That the statute of the United States which it is alleged was violated, is unconstitutional and void; (2) that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute an offense against the statute.
*144The question presented is, has congress the constitutional power to prohibit the importation,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
- Kie v. United StatesUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
- Kline v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shelp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Manning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- United States v. Alaska Pacific FisheriesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1916
- Sims v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- United States ex rel. Koehler v. McGlinchyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.