Legal Opinion · Dissent

Slatmeyer v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1926No. 19227Published

1Dissent

Marshall, C. J.,

dissenting. . I am in accord with the first paragraph of the syllabus which declares that the amendment to Section 35 of Article II of the Constitution, which became effective January 1, 1924, confers final jurisdiction upon the Industrial Commission to determine only questions of fact, and that all questions of law which are such as are usually denominated justiciable are entitled to a judicial review.

I emphatically dissent from the second syllabus, which disposes of this proceeding upon procedural grounds resulting in the dismissal of the proceeding.

The conclusion reached by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Clemmer & Johnson Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API