Legal Opinion

United States v. Sapp

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 8, 1997No. Nos. 93-20064-01-DES, 97-3181-01-DESPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 120), defendants’ Motion for New Trial, defendants’ Motion to Authorize Discovery (Doc. 137), defendants’ Motion to Expand the Record and for Other Appropriate Relief (Doc. 136), defendants’ Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 140), and defendants’ Motion for Pre-Trial Conference (Doc. 143). For the reasons discussed below, all of the above motions are denied.

I. INTRODUCTION

The defendants are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Robert Stewart v. Donald DongesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Lennox v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Biocore Medical Technologies, Inc. v. KhosrowshahiDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  2. United States v. Fletcher Sapp Ronald SappCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API