Legal Opinion

In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV131701

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 2, 1995No. 1 CA-JV 95-0036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

The juvenile Appellant was adjudicated delinquent based on her admission to a charge of attempted theft of an automobile. As part of the disposition, she was ordered to pay *482$955.29 in restitution. The juvenile’s main claim on appeal is that the victim should not have been allowed to testify by telephone at the restitution hearing. We agree. Because we conclude that the juvenile court lacks authority to permit telephonic testimony in delinquency eases, we reverse the restitution order and remand for a new restitution hearing.

The plea agreement provided that the juvenile…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Superior Court in and for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Anderson v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-92130Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty. Juv. ActionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-84536-SCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MH 2004-001987Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API