Legal Opinion
Sumner Builders Corp. v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 4, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
Sumner and P&C are not entitled to coverage under the policy that defendant issued to plaintiff Premier Drywall, Inc. because they are not named as additional insureds on the policy (see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 33 AD3d 570, 571 [1st Dept 2006]; see also e.g. Sanabria v American Home Assur. Co., 68 NY2d 866, 868 [1986]). There is no information about any additional insureds either on the schedule on which organizations included as *418insureds were to be shown or on the declarations on which information required to complete the endorsement was to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- First Financial Insurance v. Jetco Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Sanabria v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- National Abatement Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- First State Insurance v. J & S United Amusement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.