Legal Opinion

Klingenberg v. Gustin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1940No. 27631Published

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the reasonable value of summer-fallowing and seeding farm land in Whitman county.

In his complaint, plaintiff included the following allegations: That, October 17, 1917, he leased from R. S. Van Pelt and wife certain farm lands for a period ending September 30, 1919; that he held over under the terms of the original lease (a copy of which was made a part of the complaint), and continued to farm the land until some time subsequent to September 20, 1936; and that, during the year 1936, he summer-fallowed sixty-eight acres of the farm land and sowed it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Large v. ShivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Gustin v. KlingenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API