Legal Opinion

O'Brien Bros. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 30, 1948No. 110, Docket 21157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The appellants attack the findings that the scow was seaworthy and that the scow overturned because leakage had accumulated during the loading to a level higher than the keelsons at the stern.

On the question of seaworthiness, the trial judge relied upon the testimony of the expert who indicated that the scow was seaworthy. We must accept this finding. Similarly, we must accept his finding, based on sufficient testimony, that the overturning was caused by the collection of water in the stern until the water-level was higher than the keelsons'.

The fact that she was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. F. E. Grauwiller Transp. Co. v. Exner Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Demsey & Associates, Inc. v. S.S. Sea StarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Demsey & Associates, Inc. And Interstate Steel Company v. S.S. Sea Star, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., World Bulk Shipping Ltd., Atlantic Marine Enterprises, Inc., and Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. The Jordan International Co., Defendant-Impleaded-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. United States of America, as Owner of the S.S. Byron Darnton, Libelant-Appellee v. The Bull Steamship LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. In re MahoneyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1966
  5. Gural v. Terry Contracting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API