Legal Opinion

Goodson v. County of Plumas

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 9, 2024No. 2:18-cv-03105Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Tiffany Goodson, No. 2:18-cv-03105-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. County of Plumas, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Tiffany Goodson moves for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs and requests 18 | injunctive relief. For the reasons below, the court grants her motion in part. 19 | IT. BACKGROUND 20 After a six-day bench trial, Goodson proved defendants Brandon Compton and the County 21 | of Plumas are liable for sexual harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing 22 | Act…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API