Legal Opinion
Ball v. United States Copper Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1931No. 3702PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLEY, C. J.
Appellees have moved that appellant be required to file a perfect and complete transcript of the record and proceedings in this cause, and, in default thereof, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.
The transcript now on file is claimed to be imperfect in the following particulars:
That appellees’ exhibits numbered 24 to 31 are not copied into said transcript or made a part thereof, nor has any statement of their existence or substance, with so much of their contents as shall be necessary to a proper presentation of the point at issue, been agreed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mears & Lewis v. DexterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Norfolk & Western R. v. Dunnaway's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. FairclothNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Baca v. Unknown Heirs of PalaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Farmers' Cotton Finance Corp. v. GreenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Silver City v. ScartacciniNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- L Bar Cattle Co. v. Board of Trustees, Etc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941