City of Baton Rouge v. Mahnken
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Per curiam
The defendant, Richard Mahnken, was charged, by affidavit, with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic beverages, in violation of Section 98 of Title 14 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. The defendant filed a Motion to Quash the affidavit alleging that pursuant to Act 233 of 1970 (La.R.S. 13:1894.1) defendant was charged under La.R.S. 14:98 rather than under the appropriate city ordinance, and that R.S. 13:1894.1 is unconstitutional in its application to this case for the reason that it conflicts with the Charter of the City of Baton Rouge, which is protected by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Alexandria v. La CombeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- City of New Orleans v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bartels v. RousselLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- City of Baton Rouge v. ShortSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. CoodySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Brossette v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- City of Lake Charles v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.