Legal Opinion

City of Baton Rouge v. Mahnken

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 3, 1972No. 51618PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Richard Mahnken, was charged, by affidavit, with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic beverages, in violation of Section 98 of Title 14 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. The defendant filed a Motion to Quash the affidavit alleging that pursuant to Act 233 of 1970 (La.R.S. 13:1894.1) defendant was charged under La.R.S. 14:98 rather than under the appropriate city ordinance, and that R.S. 13:1894.1 is unconstitutional in its application to this case for the reason that it conflicts with the Charter of the City of Baton Rouge, which is protected by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Alexandria v. La CombeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. City of New Orleans v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bartels v. RousselLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. City of Baton Rouge v. ShortSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. State v. CoodySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Brossette v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. City of Lake Charles v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API