Legal Opinion

Rosencrans v. Fry

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 30, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

12 N.J. 88 (1953)

95 A.2d 905

LEE ROSENCRANS, ARTHUR ROSENCRANS, AND HARRY ROSENCRANS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

WILLIAM M. FRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 24, 1953.

Decided March 30, 1953.

Mr. Jerome C. Eisenberg argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Israel Spicer and Mr. George Rosling, of the New York Bar, on the brief; Messrs. Eisenberg & Spicer, attorneys).

Mr. Ernest E. Roberts, of the Florida Bar, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William Abbotts, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

This appeal, certified by our own…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re the Accounting of HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Moffett v. . ElmendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Callen v. GillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Liberty Title & Trust Co. v. PlewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API