Legal Opinion
Howard v. Tanium, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 12, 2024No. 3:21-cv-09703Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIEL HOWARD, Case No. 21-cv-09703-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR TRIAL BY 9 v. JURY AND MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT 10 TANIUM, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 66, 70 Defendant. 11 12 13 Daniel Howard filed suit against his former employer, Tanium Inc., alleging Tanium 14 fraudulently induced him to join Tanium as an employee. The Court granted Defendant’s motion 15 for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 48.) The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the case. (Dkt. 16 No. 60.) Now pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Louise Parrott, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Parrott, Deceased v. Max v. Wilson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Joanne Beckham v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Consolidated Data Terminals, a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.