Legal Opinion

Helberg v. Zuck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMobliNG, J.

I. We find it unnecessary to set out at length the issues and the evidence in this case, both of which are complicated. For the purposes of this appeal, it is suf-fiC]'enf to say that the plaintiff claims that Ful-kerson fraudulently misrepresented to him the financial condition of the Eastern Iowa Flour Company, a corporation of which Fulkerson was secretary, and in which plaintiff purchased stock in alleged reliance upon such representation; that Fulkerson, by signing the stock certificate issued to plaintiff, bearing the recital “capital stock $25,000,” fraudulently represented that it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brookfield v. Drury CollegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Sutcliffe v. PenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Ross v. SalminenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swain v. Oregon Motor StagesOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re Andrews'estateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API