Legal Opinion

Murray v. Cunningham

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Savage, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

A rehearing was granted in this ease on the application of the plaintiff in error, and the entire record has been carefully re-examined. To the plaintiff’s acoount^ the items of which are set out in detail, amounting in the aggregate to the sum of $87.45, the defendant pleads — -first, a general denial; second, that the plaintiff is indebted to him in the sum of $17.79, with interest from January 1, 1875 ; third, that prior to the commencement of the suit he tendered to the defendant the sum of $18, and has kept said tender good by depositing the money in court. The items of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Babcock v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James v. HoganNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. DoughertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  3. Cobbey v. KnappNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Sabin v. MichaelsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Phœnix Ins. v. ReadingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API