Schmidt v. Putnam County Office of the Sheriff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In order to be eligible for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, a covered municipal employee need only prove a direct causal relationship between job duties and the resulting illness or injury (see Matter of White v County of Cortland, 97 NY2d 336, 340 [2002]). The word “duties” in General Municipal Law § 207-c encompasses the full range of a covered employee’s job duties (see Matter of Theroux v Reilly, 1 NY3d 232, 244 [2003]). Preexisting nonwork-related conditions do not bar recovery under General Municipal Law § 207-c when the petitioner demonstrates that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MATTER OF THEROUX v. ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- White v. County of CortlandNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tancredi v. Town of Harrison Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Brunner v. BertoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Lowther v. County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Lynn v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- MAMBRETTI, MEGHAN M. v. NEW YORK STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.