United States v. Brandon
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Senior Judge:
Among his assignments of error,1 appellant claims that because his offenses were alcohol-related and because his expressed desire is to complete his enlistment, a sentence that includes an unsuspended bad-conduct discharge is inappropriately severe.2
Appellant vigorously contests the Government’s reliance upon United States v. Hendon, 6 M.J. 171 (C.M.A.1979),3 for the proposition that the adjudged sentence is appropriate because appellant received the full benefit of his pretrial agreement. Although we conclude that an unsuspended bad-conduct discharge is appropriate for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. KinmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CronUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. FieldsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015