Legal Opinion

Keith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1941No. 7 Div. 574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

The defendant and the prosecutor were coterminous proprietors of land. Defendant was convicted in the lower court of trespass after warning, and appeals to this court. The offense charged was that proscribed by the first clause of Section 5554, Code 1923; specifically, that he wrongfully entered on the prosecutor’s premises after having been warned, within six months preceding, not to do so. The disputed area was an eight or ten acre pasture, under fence, upon which the prosecutor, at the time, was keeping his cow, a yearling, and a mule.

It was proven for the State that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Burks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Central Iron & Coal Co. v. WrightAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Bohannon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Ross v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Valkenburg v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API