Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Livingston & Cheney-Frantex, Longford-Weavers, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The award is invalid as to Mayar Silk Mills, Inc., not a party to. the contract or the arbitration proceeding. (Matter of Brescia Constr. Co. v. Walart Constr. Co., 264 N. Y. 260.) Moreover, the award is not mutual, final and definite (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462, subd. 4) in that it fails to state the amount of damages or the basis for computation thereof. (Meyer v. Merritt, 7 A D 2d 917; Matter of Albert J. Pfeiffer, Inc. [Largman, Gray Co.], 22-2 App. Div. 62.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brescia Construction Co. v. Walart Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Fox v. Le ComteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Guetta & Raxon Fabrics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Property Management, Ltd. v. Howasa, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973